Research Publications
Research
Latest research publications, working papers, and ongoing projects:
A Framework and Databases for Measuring Entrepreneurial Ecosystems
Abstract: Scholarly literature on the concept of entrepreneurial ecosystems has increased sharply over the past five years. The surge in interest has also heightened the demand for robust empirical measures that capture the complexity of dynamic relationships among ecosystem constituents. We offer a framework for measurement that places collaborative relationships among entrepreneurs, firms, government agencies, and research institutions at the center of the ecosystem concept. We further emphasize the four roles of the federal government as a catalyst, coordinator, certifier, and customer in shaping these relationships. Despite the central importance of these firm-government interactions, there is surprisingly little research on suitable methodologies and appropriate data for systematically and reliably incorporating them into measures of ecosystem health. Our study aims to address this gap in the literature by first developing a conceptual framework for measuring entrepreneurial ecosystems and then describing an array of accompanying databases that provide rich and detailed information on firms and their relationships with government organizations, accelerators, and research institutions. A major advantage of our approach is that all the underlying databases are drawn from non-confidential, publicly available sources that are transparently disclosed and regularly updated. This greatly expands the potential community of scholars, managers, and policymakers that may independently use these databases to test theories, make decisions, and formulate policies related to innovation and entrepreneurship.
Recommended Citation: Johnson, E. E., Hemmatian, I., Lanahan, L., & Joshi, A. M. (2022). “A Framework and Databases for Measuring Entrepreneurial Ecosystems.” Research Policy. 51.2: 104398
The Role of Community Development Financial Institutions in Supporting Inclusive Economic Development
Abstract: While prior scholarship examines the relationship between community development financial institutions (CDFIs) and economic development, little is known about their effectiveness and impact on cultivating inclusive urban entrepreneurship. The authors contend that greater attention directed toward young firms’ persistent needs for early resource acquisition, coupled with increased emphasis on the activity among business owners from minoritized groups, can extend the extant literature in a more inclusive manner. To do so, the authors trace the diffusion of CDFIs across the United States between 2013 and 2021 to examine their association with underrepresented minority-owned and/or young firms. One finding is that the presence of CDFIs bolsters the share of minoritized firms at the city level. Further, the authors find that this positive relationship holds for young firms owned by minoritized groups. The empirical results are contextualized with a case study of a nonprofit community bank seeking CDFI certification. This example highlights the importance of providing business assistance and financial capital to urban entrepreneurs.
Recommended Citation: Johnson, E. E., Lanahan, L., Joshi, A. M., & Hemmatian, I. (2025). “The Role of Community Development Financial Institutions in Supporting Inclusive Economic Development.” Economic Development Quarterly. 39(3), 196-210.
Drivers of Firm-Government Engagement for Technology Ventures
Abstract: Prior scholarship generally examines the returns generated by firm-government engagement. These studies are based on an implicit and understudied assumption – the firm’s strategic choice of whether to engage with the government. Here, we unpack the drivers of this choice. To do so, we construct a population-level sample of U.S. high-tech ventures founded between 2015–2017; the full sample exceeds one million firms. We then utilize government records to identify initial firm-government engagement; approximately 24,000 high-tech ventures reveal this preference by firm age three. We examine a range of external and internal factors that may motivate such a choice. The results indicate that firm-government engagement most prominently coincides with firm resource constraints. Features driving such engagement include: (i) underrepresented minority-owned firms; (ii) small firms; (iii) firms with greater early-stage growth potential; and (iv) firms located in less intensive entrepreneurial settings. This study offers managerial, policy, and scholarly contributions by uncovering new insights around firm strategy and government opportunities for high-tech ventures.
Recommended Citation: Lanahan, L., Hemmatian, I., Joshi, A. M., & Johnson, E. E. (2025). “Drivers of Firm-Government Engagement for Technology Ventures.” PLOS ONE. 20(10): e0333710.